‹ directory
79MCP SCORE
C
aria-icons
https://icons.leularia.com/api/mcp
12 tools266 resources~1.5k tok/req0% annot.proto 2026-07-28
Score by pillar
Security ·20100
Tool design ·1882
Schemas / desc ·1658
Reliability ·1480
Context-cost ·1279
Compliance ·1270
Coverage ·880
reliability: LOW (T1 single-shot, not credited - requires T3 >=24h)
Context-cost
1.5ktokens for
tools/listPaid on every request. Lean footprint for 12 tools.
this server1.5k
median≈ 3k
MCP primitive coverage
the quality score covers tools12
Tools
266
Resources
0
Prompts · none
Why this score — causal attribution
Each penalty: measure → mechanism → effect → Δscore.
Compliance · MEDIUM−3.6
0 declared annotations → destructiveHint/openWorldHint missing -> worst-case defaults → the tool is treated as destructive & open-world by clients
Schemas / desc · HIGH−3.5
67% typed+described params → schema = the contract the agent fills in → more malformed calls
Compliance · LOW−0.6
no OAuth discovery (.well-known missing) → RFC 9728/8414 not exposed → auth not auto-discoverable by clients
Tool design · MEDIUM−0.5
1 clusters consolidables → list/get/search/... repeated on the same object → candidates to merge into composite tools
Suggested composite optimizations
list_icons, search_icons, get_icons →
query_icons(filter, fields, limit)search_icons, list_icons, get_icons, recommend_icons →
icons (outil unique avec param `action`, ou sous-serveur namespacé)get_icon_svg ↔ get_icons, get_icon ↔ get_icons →
renommer pour distinguerBadge — paste it in your README
[](https://checkmcp.dev/report?url=https%3A%2F%2Ficons.leularia.com%2Fapi%2Fmcp)Own this server?Get verified — fresh re-audit, badge if you pass ›
About aria-icons — FAQ
Is the aria-icons MCP server safe to use?+
CheckMCP audited aria-icons and gave it an MCP Score of 79/100 (grade C) — moderate — some quality or security gaps worth reviewing. The audit runs an OWASP MCP Top 10 security pass (tool poisoning, hardcoded secrets, command injection, the lethal trifecta) against the live endpoint; see the per-pillar breakdown and the "why this score" attribution on this page, and re-audit anytime at checkmcp.dev.
What is the MCP Score of aria-icons?+
aria-icons scores 79/100 (grade C) on CheckMCP's vendor-neutral audit across six weighted pillars — security, tool design, schemas, context-cost, compliance and coverage — with reliability measured and shown but not yet credited.
How many tools does aria-icons expose, and what is its context cost?+
aria-icons exposes 12 tools, and its tools/list response costs roughly 1.5k tokens — paid on every request your agent makes to it. Lower is better for your context budget.
How was aria-icons scored?+
By probing the live MCP endpoint (https://icons.leularia.com/api/mcp), inspecting its tools, schemas and protocol compliance, running an OWASP MCP Top 10 security pass, and measuring the token cost of tools/list — then attributing every penalty as measure → mechanism → effect. The methodology is open: checkmcp.dev/#methodology.