‹ directory
82MCP SCORE
B
footalytics
https://footalytics.farvor.com/mcp
5 tools~760 tok/req0% annot.proto 2025-06-18
Score by pillar
Security ·20100
Tool design ·18100
Schemas / desc ·1680
Reliability ·1480
Context-cost ·1279
Compliance ·1252
Coverage ·850
reliability: LOW (T1 single-shot, not credited - requires T3 >=24h)
Context-cost
760tokens for
tools/listPaid on every request. Lean footprint for 5 tools.
this server760
median≈ 3k
MCP primitive coverage
the quality score covers tools5
Tools
0
Resources · none
0
Prompts · none
Why this score — causal attribution
Each penalty: measure → mechanism → effect → Δscore.
Compliance · MEDIUM−3.6
0 declared annotations → destructiveHint/openWorldHint missing -> worst-case defaults → the tool is treated as destructive & open-world by clients
Compliance · MEDIUM−1.7
JSON-RPC-compliant errors 1/2 → errors not compliant with the JSON-RPC spec → clients break unpredictably
Compliance · MEDIUM−0.5
proto 2025-06-18 (2 rev. behind 2025-11-25) → outdated protocol version → recent features unavailable, recent clients weakened
Badge — paste it in your README
[](https://checkmcp.dev/report?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffootalytics.farvor.com%2Fmcp)Own this server?Get verified — fresh re-audit, badge if you pass ›
About footalytics — FAQ
Is the footalytics MCP server safe to use?+
CheckMCP audited footalytics and gave it an MCP Score of 82/100 (grade B) — good — only minor issues. The audit runs an OWASP MCP Top 10 security pass (tool poisoning, hardcoded secrets, command injection, the lethal trifecta) against the live endpoint; see the per-pillar breakdown and the "why this score" attribution on this page, and re-audit anytime at checkmcp.dev.
What is the MCP Score of footalytics?+
footalytics scores 82/100 (grade B) on CheckMCP's vendor-neutral audit across six weighted pillars — security, tool design, schemas, context-cost, compliance and coverage — with reliability measured and shown but not yet credited.
How many tools does footalytics expose, and what is its context cost?+
footalytics exposes 5 tools, and its tools/list response costs roughly 760 tokens — paid on every request your agent makes to it. Lower is better for your context budget.
How was footalytics scored?+
By probing the live MCP endpoint (https://footalytics.farvor.com/mcp), inspecting its tools, schemas and protocol compliance, running an OWASP MCP Top 10 security pass, and measuring the token cost of tools/list — then attributing every penalty as measure → mechanism → effect. The methodology is open: checkmcp.dev/#methodology.