‹ repos
86REPO SCORE
B
HealthClawGuardrails
Open-source guardrails between AI agents and FHIR clinical data — PHI redaction, immutable audit, step-up auth, tenant isolation. MCP server + OpenAI/Gemini adapters. A healthclaw.io project.
★ 30⑂ 13MITpush 2d
Score by pillar
Maintenance ·4040/40
License ·2525/25
Adoption ·206/20
Documentation ·1515/15
Why this score — attribution
Adoption · LOW−14
30 stars → low community traction → less peer review/hardening
Repo Score badge
[](https://checkmcp.dev/repo/aks129-healthclawguardrails)Own this server?Get verified — fresh re-audit, badge if you pass ›
About HealthClawGuardrails — FAQ
Is the HealthClawGuardrails MCP repository well-maintained?+
CheckMCP's Repo-Quality Score for aks129/HealthClawGuardrails is 86/100 (grade B), graded on maintenance, license, adoption and documentation. Last pushed 2 days ago, 30 stars, MIT.
What is the Repo-Quality Score of aks129/HealthClawGuardrails?+
aks129/HealthClawGuardrails scores 86/100 (grade B) — a vendor-neutral grade of the backing GitHub repository across four pillars: maintenance, license, adoption and documentation.
Where can I find or install the HealthClawGuardrails MCP server?+
The source is at github.com/aks129/HealthClawGuardrails.
Why did aks129/HealthClawGuardrails score 86?+
The biggest deduction: 30 stars → low community traction → less peer review/hardening (−14). Every penalty is attributed this way; see the full breakdown on this page.